|Photo by James K. Lindsey|
We can't help but become. We are constantly changing. Do we need to worry and wring our hands about the future, if becoming is continuously occurring, anyway?
If the saying, "Tat Tvam Asi" (Thou Art That), written in the Upanishads is at once true, then what is it I need to become? The whole idea of striving toward an endpoint, ala Teilhard De Chardin, is a mistake, I think. Seeing we are eternal beings, how does eternity infer an endpoint? Development in a linear fashion seems to be very important to Western culture. But what if linearity is a flawed view of things?
I am that, so there is no need for me to be anxious. I am that I am. I am already what I was meant to be. There is no further need for development in the egoistic sense. Jettison the idea that "I" means "ego; it doesn't in this context. The Real You is the Eternal You.
By making the statement, I am that, I recognize I cannot know the unknowable. I know what I can know, i.e. the knowable. The unknown cannot be known with that which is known. So, if I am to know the unknowable, I cannot know it with my brain.
What can I know? Only that which becomes, i.e. the universe. I cannot be conscious of that which is not conscious.
All that remains is a tremendous sense of tremendous mystery. Live!